Legal Opinion
Ex parte Salinger
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 13, 1923No. 206PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOUGH, Circuit Judge.
A grand jury for the Western division of the district of South Dakota found an indictment against Salinger for *754violation of Criminal Code, § 215 (Comp. St. § 10385); i. e., for devising a scheme to defraud, and for the purpose of executing the same placing a letter (or other enumerated written or printed matter) in an authorized depository for mail matter to be sent or delivered by the post office establishment of the United States.
Salinger is accused by indictment of conducting his alleged scheme to defraud in and from Sioux City, Iowa, of which state he avers himself to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Hyde v. ShineSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Reese v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Brown v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Salinger v. LoiselSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Grady Carroll Ouzts v. Maryland National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Southern Surety Co. of Des Moines v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Alberto Lopez, Jr. v. O.L. McCotterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.