Legal Opinion
Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 10, 1930No. 5462PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, District Judge.
Appellant became surety on a bail bond or recognizance, which provides, so far as material now, that the defendant “shall” appear “from term to term * * 3 to answer an indictment * * * and shall then and there abide the judgment of this court and not depart the court without leave thereof. 3 * 3 ” Judgment was entered against the surety, from which it has appealed.
The defendant appeared on November 15, 1927, and pleaded guilty, whereupon he was sentenced “to be imprisoned * 61 ” fourteen months from January 3, 1928, * * * former bond to remain in full force and effect…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Reese v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Ripley v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States of America, and v. Larry Kenneth Gonware, Glenn Holmes Bail Bond AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Stuyvesant Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Palermo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- United States v. WidenDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1930
- United States v. Calogero D'anna, Principal International Fidelity Insurance Co., SuretyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.