Legal Opinion

Brown v. Elliott

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 10, 1912No. 201, 202PublishedCited by 131 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

225 U.S. 392 (1912)

BROWN

v.

ELLIOTT, UNITED STATES MARSHAL IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, et al.

MOORE

v.

ELLIOTT, UNITED STATES MARSHAL IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

Nos. 201, 202.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued October 19, 1911.

Reargued May 1, 1912.

Decided June 10, 1912.

APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

Mr. Henry F. Woodard and Mr. A.A. Birney for appellants.

The Solicitor General for appellee.

2Opinion of the Court · McKENNAJustice McKENNA

These appeals involve the action of the Circuit Court in dismissing petitions for writs of habeas corpus to…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. KisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Hyde v. ShineSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
  4. Lorenz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1904
  5. Brown v. C. T. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by131 opinions

  1. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Fiswick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API