Satchell v. Sonic Notify, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND DENYING, IN PART, MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
JEFFREY S. WHITE, United States District Judge
Now before the Court for consideration are the motions to dismiss filed by Yinzcam, Inc. (“Yinzcam”), Golden State Warriors, LLC (“the Warriors”), and Sig-nal360, Inc. (f/k/a Sonic Notify, Inc.) (“Sig-nal360”). The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this ease, and for the reasons set forth in the remainder of this Order, the Court HEREBY GRANTS, IN PART, AND DENIES, IN PART, the motions.
BACKGR…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Biesenbach v. DOES 1-3District Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Hood v. City of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Rios v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021