Legal Opinion

Hamm v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 30, 2019No. 5:16-cv-03370Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 TERRY HAMM, et al., 8 Case No. 5:16-cv-03370-EJD Plaintiffs, 9 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S 10 MOTION FOR SUMMARY MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, JUDGMENT; DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ 11 CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL Defendant. SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR 12 SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OF ISSUES 13 Re: Dkt. No. 58 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Plaintiffs Terry Hamm (“Hamm”) and Bryce Meeker (“Meeker”) bring various consumer 16 protection claims predicated on allegations that Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC 17…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Taye Addisu Mokhtar Al-Saeed Ghassan Abu Hemdeh v. Fred Meyer, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API