Barry v. Maddalena
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
—As heirs at law of Bobert Emmett Barry, appellants sought damages from defendants resulting from the wrongful death of deceased. On this appeal they contend (1) that the evidence is insufficient to support a finding that defendants were free from negligence or (2) that Mr. Barry was guilty of contributory negligence, and (3) that certain instructions were erroneous.(1) About 11:30 p. m. on the night of July 30, 1942, defendant Clem Maddalena and his minor son, Clemente, were proceeding northerly in the father’s Chevrolet on U. S. Highway 101 with Clemente in the driver’s seat. The weather…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Rush v. LagomarsinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Crabbe v. Mammoth Channel Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Jones v. Goldtree Bros. Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Wiswell v. ShinnersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lasater v. Oakland Scavenger Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Wilkerson v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Wahrenbrock v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Koon v. SherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Rangel v. BadolatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.