Legal Opinion

Wiswell v. Shinners

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 3, 1941No. Civ. 12580PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

This appeal is taken from a judgment for defendants upon a directed verdict returned by the jury in an action brought by the widow of Wilkens W. Wiswell to recover damages for the death of said decedent, who was killed when struck by an automobile driven by defendant Marvin P. Shinners, who at the time was acting as the agent and employee of defendant Harold E. Shugart Company.

Upon completion of the testimony offered by both sides the defendants moved the court to direct the jury to return a verdict in favor of such defendants. Said motion was grounded on the claim that “the evidence at this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Crabbe v. Mammoth Channel Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kataoka v. May Department Stores Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Wells Truckways, Ltd. v. CebrianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Jensen v. LeonardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Ryan v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Wahrenbrock v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API