Legal Opinion

Wahrenbrock v. Los Angeles Transit Lines

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1948No. Civ. 15966PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J. pro tem.

Appeal by plaintiffs, the widow, children and business partner of Elmer Norman Wahrenbrock, from a judgment entered upon the granting of a motion for a judgment of nonsuit in an action for damages.

The complaint is in three counts: (1) for wrongful death, (2) for money expended by reason of the alleged wrongful death, (3) for damage to a truck.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, drawing all reasonable inferences in their favor, and disregarding all conflicting and contradictory evidence, the facts are these: On December 4,1945, at about 6 o’clock…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Westberg v. WilldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Mar Shee v. Maryland Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wells Truckways, Ltd. v. CebrianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Hom v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Miller v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Steward v. PaigeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Niiya v. GotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API