Legal Opinion
Billings v. Gates
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 22, 1995No. 94-02-26238-M; CA A83424PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
Plaintiff appeals the dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. ORS 34.370(2)(b)(A). We reverse and remand.
Plaintiff, an inmate at the Snake River Correctional Institute (SRCI), petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging:
“The shoes the institution has [have] no arch supports, and Petitioner has attempted to address this problem, because any walking causes the Petitioner pain to the point where he cannot walk. When the Doctor did see the Petitioner, he told him that he has high arches, will have to buy arch supports off of the commissary, that SRCI will not provide arch…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sterling v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Bedell v. SchiedlerOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Keenan v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Moore v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Meadows v. SchiedlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Billings v. GatesOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Jones v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Jones v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Clark v. GatesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.