Legal Opinion

Moore v. Peterson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 22, 1988No. 86-C-12447 CA A45499PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

In this habeas corpus proceeding, petitioner, an inmate of the Oregon State Correctional Institution (OSCI), appeals from a summary judgment for defendant. Petitioner alleges that, by denying him treatment by specialists for his heart disease, diabetes, ear infection, bronchitis and tuberculosis, OSCI has provided inadequate treatment. The matter came before the trial court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Because we find that there are genuine issues of material fact concerning the medical care of petitioner, we reverse and remand.

Summary judgment is proper when the moving party has…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Priest v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Jorgenson v. SchiedlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Billings v. GatesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. Fox v. ZenonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. Jones v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Bahrenfus v. BachikCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. McClaflin v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API