Legal Opinion

Jones v. Armenakis

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 9, 1996No. 94C-13804; CA A86915PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Plaintiff appeals the dismissal of his pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiffs petition alleged: In 1985, he was convicted of armed robbery and robbery; in 1986 and 1993, the Board of Parole (Board) established his parole release date as October 18, 1994; on September 25, 1994, he received a “disciplinary misconduct” report for assault, disobedience of an order, and disrespect; “on or before” October 11, 1994, an employee of the Department of Corrections recommended that his parole release date be reset; that recommendation was “contrary” to Department of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Penrod v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Billings v. GatesOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Billings v. GatesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. Troxel v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Gomez v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jones v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Frady v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Jones v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Rankin v. LandersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. Cheever v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API