Legal Opinion

Prather v. Zulauf

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1871PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from the Clark Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

Zulauf sued Prather and Nixon on a promissory note, a copy of which was filed with the complaint. Nixon made default. Prather pleaded as follows: first, a general denial of each and every allegation in the complaint; second, that he never signed or executed the note sued on, nor did he authorize or direct the execution of the same; third, that no consideration whatever moved from the plaintiff to him for the execution of said note, and that he only signed the same as the surety of said Nixon, as the plaintiff knew; that the note was first dated November 1st, 1868; that it was, in fact, signed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wallace v. CravensIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Ketcham v. New Albany & Salem RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Smith v. HunterIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. W. H. Barber Co. v. HughesIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Palmer v. PoorIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Nicholson v. CombsIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Cann v. CannWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Magic Packing Co. v. Stone-Ordean Wells Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API