Nicholson v. Combs
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Clark Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
— To the complaint of appellant, charging that the appellees William C. Combs, Eichard F. Nugent and David S. Noons executed to him the promissory note sued on, the appellees Combs and Nugent answered separately. The answer of the former is, omitting formal parts, as follows: “ That after he and his co-defendant Eichard F. Nugent had executed and delivered the note sued on herein, and without the knowledge or consent of this defendant, the plaintiff procured David S. Noons to subscribe the said note as one of the makers thereof.”
It is urged that the answer is bad, for the reason that it *516does…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Graham v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Bowers' Adm'r v. BriggsIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- Prather v. ZulaufIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Bowman v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Henry v. CoatsIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Houck v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Globe Accident Insurance v. ReidIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
- Smith v. JamesIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Indiana Trust Co. v. ByramIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
- Van Valkenburgh v. OldhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.