Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Lott

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 21, 1946No. 15405PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The plaintiff introduced in evidence, without objection, numerous tax' receipts for State, county, and city taxes, canceled checks and drafts which he had issued for the payment of taxes, and notices of tax assessments sent to him; and he undertook to prove by parol evidence their relation to the property in controversy. Objection was made to such oral testimony on the ground that the original tax returns and assessments made would be higher and better evidence, which objection was sustained. Whatever probative value the documents may have…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. DaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Hardeman v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Chapple v. HightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  4. Hicks v. HicksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  5. Armour Fertilizer Works v. DwightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. UIV CORP. v. OswaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Burke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. Barbee v. BarbeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  4. Saliba v. SalibaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  5. Georgia Power Co. v. FountainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API