Georgia Power Co. v. Fountain
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Candler, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts). This case involves the doctrine of election of remedies and the principle of estoppel resulting therefrom. Beard v. Beard, 197 Ga. 487 (29 S. E. 2d, 595). Estoppel by election results where a choice is exercised between inconsistent remedies. Chapple v. Hight, 161 Ga. 629 (131 S. E. 505). The election and prosecution of an available remedy is a bar to the pursuit later of an inconsistent one. Hardeman v. Ellis, 162 Ga. 664 (135 S. E. *366195). An election of remedies has been defined as the choosing between two or more different and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hardeman v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Oliver v. Union Point & White Plains RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Atlantic & Birmingham Railroad v. PennySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Neal Loan & Banking Co. v. ChastainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Peterson v. LottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Woodside v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- UIV CORP. v. OswaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Williams v. City of LaGrangeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- State Highway Department v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Schoolcraft v. DeKalb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.