Legal Opinion

Saliba v. Saliba

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 14, 1946No. 15644PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Presiding Justice.

This court has repeatedly ruled that the defect of duplicity in pleadings can be taken advantage of only by special demurrer. Johnson v. Edwards, 147 Ga. 438 (94 S. E. 554); Waldrup v. Central of Ga. Ry. Co., 127 Ga. 359 (56 S. E. 439); Citizens & Southern Bank v. Union Warehouse Co., 157 Ga. 434, 456 (122 S. E. 327); Elrod v. Anchor Duck Mills, 50 Ga. App. 531, 534 (179 S. E. 188). The special demurrer in the instant case complains ■ both that the petition is duplicitous, and that the two inconsistent allegations are set forth only in the alternative. While this…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. City of Columbus v. AnglinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Napier v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. Citizens & Southern Bank v. Union Warehouse & Compress Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  4. Doyal v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  5. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. TapleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Saliba v. SalibaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  2. Burnam v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  3. Richards & Associates, Inc. v. StudstillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  4. Hames v. City of MariettaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  5. Driver v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API