Legal Opinion
California Casualty Indemnity Exchange v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Supreme Court
Decided March 19, 1943No. S. F. No. 16834PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRIFFIN, J. pro tem.
— This is a proceeding to review an order of the Industrial Accident Commission granting compensation for personal injuries.
On October 27, 1941, the petitioner was the employer’s insurance carrier. The injured employee was a bookkeeper for an automobile parts concern in South San Francisco. She had been with the company for 22 years. Her normal working hours were from 8 a. m. to 4:30 p. m. She had the implied consent of her employer to go on such short personal errands as she desired during working hours and without any deduction being made in her salary. The evidence…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bountiful Brick Co. v. GilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Freire v. Matson Navigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- De Constantin v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Ocean Acc. Etc. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Hinojosa v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Saala v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Kobe v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Cal. Cas. Ind. Exch. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.