Richmond v. Moore
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKoford, P. J.
The above-named minor respondent and his parents obtained separate verdicts and judgments for damages for personal injuries received by the minor when struck by the automobile of appellant.
The points raised on appeal relate to the sufficiency of the proof, the examination of the jurors, rulings on the evidence and instructions to the jury.
The minor was eight years of age at the time of the accident. He was struck by the appellant’s automobile just after he had stepped off of the No. 32 street-car at its southerly and westerly terminus on the west side of Stanyan Street just north of Haight…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Berkovitz v. American River Gravel Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- East Bay Municipal Utility District v. KiefferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Dougherty v. EllingsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Coleman v. FarwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hayward v. YostIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
- Baxter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Blanton v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Estate of HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Hair v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.