Legal Opinion
Filson v. Balkins
California Supreme Court
Decided January 8, 1929No. Docket No. 8183PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
Action for personal injuries. Plaintiff had judgment for 11500 and defendant has appealed.
On July 24, 1923, plaintiff was struck by an automobile driven by defendant and was quite seriously injured. The place of the accident was three or four feet west of the center line of the highway running north and south and at a point two miles south of the town of Newhall in Los Angeles County. The traveled part of the roadway in this region was twenty-one feet. The automobile was coming from the south, traveling north. The proper side of the highway, according to the law of the road, was the east side…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. ScamellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Henry v. LingsweilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
3Cited by21 opinions
- Francis v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Long v. BarbieriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Maggart v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Schulman v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Wolfe, Admr. v. BaskinOhio Supreme Court · 1940
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.