Legal Opinion

Pisano v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODGERS, Senior Judge.

Following the failure of plaintiff Catherine Pisano or her counsel to appear at a scheduled arbitration hearing, the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas entered a judgment of non pros in favor of defendant, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) and, on July 19,1993, denied plaintiffs petition to open judgment on the ground that plaintiff had failed to offer a legitimate excuse for the failure to appear at the hearing as required by Pa.R.C.P. 3051(b)(2).

Plaintiff has appealed to this Court claiming inadvertence of her counsel in failing to note the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rieser v. GlukowskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davis v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Tauss v. GoldsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. C.M. Bradley v. West Chester UniversityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API