Legal Opinion

Frankfort Cincinnati Railroad Co. v. Marshall

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 21, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Rees

Affirming.

These two suits were instituted, to recover damages for the setting out of a fire by an engine of the appellant, Frankfort & Cincinnati Railroad Company. In the court below the suits were consolidated, tried as one, and in this court have been treated as one appeal.

The appellee Marshall lost a tobacco barn and certain items of personal property contained therein and he recovered a judgment for $2,653.50. When the Marshall barn burned, the fire was communicated to an outbuilding on an adjoining'lot owned by Ernest Hutchinson. This outbuilding was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. NuckolsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  3. L. & N. Railroad v. Burley Tobacco SocietyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Big Sandy & Kentucky River Railway Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. RainsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. SnowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  2. Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Roark's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API