Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Corkey

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 15, 1960PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

The plaintiff, after proper presentation of a claim to the defendant as executor of the will of Alice M. Chapman, brought this action to recover the reasonable value of miscellaneous services rendered to the decedent during the last ten years of her life at her request and upon her promise to pay “the reasonable value thereof by will.” In the will, which had been executed only about three months before the testatrix’ death, the plaintiff was bequeathed a diamond ring which was not found, could not be inventoried, and consequently was not received by the plaintiff, together with a one…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hoenig v. LubetkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. Doyle v. ReevesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  3. Hatheway v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
  4. Leahy v. CheneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  5. Graybill v. PlantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kukanskis v. JasutSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  2. Anderson v. ZweigbaumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  3. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. HillsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  4. Ginsberg v. Coating Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  5. McFarland v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.Connecticut Superior Court · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API