Legal Opinion
Ginsberg v. Coating Products, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 25, 1965PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShannon, J.
The defendants have appealed from a judgment directing them to proceed with arbitration in order to ascertain the value of the stock of Coating Products, Inc. Prior to February 20, 1957, the plaintiff S. Leonard Ginsberg was connected with the G. and T. Manufacturing Company, and the defendants Reynold H. Goodman and Myron M. Mainthow were officers of the Crystal Transparent Corporation. On that date the two corporations merged. Crystal Transparent Corporation purchased a half interest in the merged company, which later changed its name to Coating Products, Inc. There are presently issued and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters of America v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Batter Building Materials Co. v. KirschnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Connecticut Union of Telephone Workers, Inc. v. Southern New England Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- In re Curtis & Castle ArbitrationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Matter of FletcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Frager v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- A. Dubreuil & Sons, Inc. v. Town of LisbonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- W. J. Megin, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Covenant Insurance v. BanksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Security Insurance v. DeLaurentisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.