Legal Opinion

Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Hills

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 8, 1969PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKing, C. J.

The plaintiff bank is the trustee of an irrevocable, inter vivos trust established by Helen Hart, of Hartford, on January 27, 1949. The provisions of the trust which are material to a disposition of this proceeding may be stated in simplified form as follows: The trust, the validity and interpretation of which was to be governed by the laws of Connecticut, provided that the income be paid to Lotta J. Kirkpatrick during her lifetime; that at her death the income should be paid equally to Charles I. Hills and Thomas K. Hills, who were brothers; that, at the death of either, his share of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mooney v. TollesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  2. Ansonia National Bank v. KunkelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  3. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. LymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  4. Wildman's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  5. Bankers Trust Co. v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tafel EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. BoveySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. Connecticut National Bank v. ChadwickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. BirgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  5. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. CoffinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API