State v. Lake
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, C.J.
— The questions presented primarily involve the proper standard of proof required of a petitioner under RCW 10.76.070 who seeks to be discharged from confinement as a criminally insane person. At the trial below and while the state’s appeal was pending from a judgment in favor of petitioner ordering his discharge, the Supreme Court of Washington decided State v. Blubaugh, 80 Wn.2d 28, 491 P.2d 646 (1971). Blubaugh laid down a standard of proof different from the standard embodied in the court’s instructions and different from that urged by the state. The posture of this case on appeal is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Samuelson v. FreemanWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. BaddaWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. BlubaughWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. MaynerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Washburn v. City of Federal WayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Keller v. City of BellinghamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Hodgins v. OlesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973