Legal Opinion

State v. Badda

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1966No. 37709PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

This is an appeal by Edward Badda from his second conviction of participation in the robbery of the Kenmore Lanes Bowling Alley by four men in the early morning of February 8, 1961.

On Badda’s appeal from his first conviction, he was granted a new trial because of an accumulation of trial errors. The details of the crime and the identity of the confessed and alleged participants appear in the opinion on the first appeal (State v. Badda, 63 Wn.2d 176, 385 P.2d 859 (1963)).

As that opinion shows, Badda and Dolan McCollum had been tried together and convicted. At that trial, the only testimony…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. State v. CaseWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. State v. MeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State v. SevernsWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. State v. BaddaWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Lovvorn v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. BresolinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  2. State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Bitzan v. ParisiWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. CountermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API