Legal Opinion

ROLAND WELL DRILLING, INC. v. Murawski

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 6, 1989No. A89A1131PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Judge.

This is the second appearance of this action before the Court of Appeals. The facts are set forth in Murawski v. Roland Well Drilling, 188 Ga. App. 760 (374 SE2d 207) (1988), in which we addressed the validity and enforceability of the original contract and addendum (the contract) between Roland Well Drilling, Inc. (Roland Well) and G. W. Robinson and the enforceability of a subsequent trust deed. We held that the contract was valid and enforceable and the restrictive covenants imposed upon the grantees of the subdivision lots were enforceable against all properties for which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Central Georgia Electric Membership Corp. v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  2. Ætna Insurance v. LipsitzSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Murawski v. Roland Well Drilling, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Quintanilla v. RathurCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Sofran Peachtree City, LLC v. Peachtree City Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Apac-Georgia, Inc. v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Elite Realty Services, Inc. v. City of AuburnSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  5. Morgan v. Richard Bowers & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API