Legal Opinion
Apac-Georgia, Inc. v. Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 13, 1996No. A96A0593PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Judge.
This complex suit over construction of Atlanta’s downtown connector comes before us a second time. In its first appearance, Dept. of Transp. v. APAC-Georgia, 217 Ga. App. 103 (456 SE2d 668) (1995), we held that special contract specification 105.07 imposed on the Department of Transportation (“DOT”) a duty to coordinate and control the work of its prime contractors, which included APAC-Georgia (“APAC”), and that material questions of fact remained as to whether DOT had breached that duty. Id. at 105 (1).
On remand the trial court granted DOT partial summary judgment, holding that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Marathon Oil Co. v. HollisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- A. L. Williams & Associates v. FairclothSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- Department of Transportation v. Fru-Con Construction Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- State Highway Department v. Hall Paving Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Biltmore Construction Co. v. Tri-State Electrical Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. Dalton Paving & Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- King Industrial Realty, Inc. v. RichCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- AAF-McQuay, Inc. v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Capricorn Systems, Inc. v. PednekarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Stimson v. George Laycock, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.