Legal Opinion

Quintanilla v. Rathur

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 1997No. A97A0128PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

Appellee Baber Rathur, M.D. brought two separate actions against Pablo Quintanilla, M.D., seeking recovery on a promissory note in one action and on a lease agreement in the second. After consolidation, the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment, and Rathur prevailed. The trial court then calculated damages and entered judgment in favor of Rathur.

Quintanilla appeals, contending that he was insulated from liability by a default provision in a contemporaneously executed sale agreement, that the transaction as a whole was modified by the parties’ mutual departure, that a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Precise v. City of RossvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. General Electric Credit Corp. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  3. MALAGA Management Co. v. John Deere Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  4. Duke v. KHD Deutz of America Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Gold Kist Peanuts v. AlbersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gilmore v. Citigroup, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  2. Dabbs v. KEY EQUIPMENT FINANCE, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. Salahat v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. Sofran Peachtree City, LLC v. Peachtree City Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. L. D. F. Family Farm, Inc. v. CharterbankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API