Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Davis

California Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1909No. Sac. No. 1696PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the 'opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for a change of place of trial of the action from the superior court of El Dorado County to the superior court of Sacramento County, made upon the ground that the defendant was a resident of Sacramento County at the time of the commencement of the action.

The motion was heard, submitted, and determined solely upon affidavits. These affidavits were conflicting upon the question of the place of residence of defendant at the time of the commencement of the action. The affidavits of plaintiff and G. S. Estey were positive and unequivocal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lakeshore Cattle Co. v. Modoc Land & Livestock Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Tuller v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Bowers v. Modoc Land & Live Stock Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Quinn v. NevillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. Brown v. San Francisco Savings UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Johnston v. BentonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. Hiatt v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  3. In Re Estate of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Carnation Co. v. El Rey Cheese Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Estate of PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API