State v. McDougald
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BALEY, Judge.
The defendant contends that it was error for him not to be given a copy of the search warrant, that entry into his premises was illegal, and that evidence obtained by the search should be suppressed. We find no merit in these contentions.
G.S. 15-21 specifically provides that a failure to furnish copy of warrant “. . . shall not invalidate the arrest.” The offi cers read the search warrant to the defendant before any search was made, and he was advised of its contents. There was no indication in the record that defendant made any contention that he had suffered any improper…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. RieraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. WigginsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. PoindexterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. MetcalfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- State v. LashleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. GambleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.