Legal Opinion

State v. Gamble

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 17, 1981No. 8014SC886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Despite defendant’s failure to cite pertinent assignments of error and exceptions immediately following the questions in his brief as required by App. R. 28(b)(3), it appears that he has preserved four of the seven assignments of error set forth in the record.

Defendant first assigns error to the failure of the State to provide him with written notice of the revocation hearing pursuant to G.S. 15A-1345(e). He contends that this failure was a violation of his due process rights. G.S. 15A-1345(e) provides, in pertinent part: “The State must give the probationer notice of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. DuncanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. McDougaldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. BainesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. State v. SextonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. McCasterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  4. State v. DexterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API