Legal Opinion

State v. Poindexter

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 7, 1984No. 8318SC832PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

On 16 February 1983, defendant filed a pro se motion to discharge the public defender appointed to represent him. In support of his motion, defendant stated that: (1) he was dissatisfied with the appointed counsel; (2) the appointed counsel had neglected defendant’s case; (3) the appointed counsel had repeatedly refused to handle the case in defendant’s best interest; and (4) the appointed counsel acted in concert with the State’s interest. When defendant’s case was called for trial on 23 February 1983, the trial judge conducted a hearing on defendant’s pro se motion to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. State v. HutchinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Hutcherson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  3. State v. BogusNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  4. People v. BarnumCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Martin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API