Legal Opinion
Stalban v. Friedman
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCotillo, J.
The facts in this case establish the female plaintiff as the owner of a small restaurant, located at 645 Lexington avenue, Manhattan, doing business under the trade name and style of Old Russian Rear Restaurant, a purveyor of Russian food, having been so engaged during the last five years. The restaurant is a very small one, employing four waiters and three kitchen helpers. Plaintiff-owner does part of the cooking herself. Dinners are sold for eighty-five cents and luncheons for forty-five cents.
A contract was signed October 10, 1937, between the plaintiff and the Hotel Restaurant and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Texas & NOR Co. v. Brotherhood of Ry. & Steamship ClerksSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- American Steel Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Lauf v. E. G. Shinner & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Markham & Callow, Inc. v. International WoodworkersOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Euclid Candy Co. of New York, Inc. v. SummaNew York Supreme Court · 1940
- Serval Slide Fasteners, Inc. v. MolfettaNew York Supreme Court · 1947
- McKay v. Retail Automobile Salesmen's Local Union No. 1067California Supreme Court · 1940
- McKay v. Retail Automobile Salesmen's Local Union No. 1067California Supreme Court · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.