Legal Opinion
McKay v. Retail Automobile Salesmen's Local Union No. 1067
California Supreme Court
Decided October 14, 1940No. S. F. 16016Published
1Opinion of the Court
16 Cal.2d 311 (1940)
JAMES F. McKAY et al., Appellants,
v.
RETAIL AUTOMOBILE SALESMEN'S LOCAL UNION No. 1067 et al., Respondents.
S. F. No. 16016.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
October 14, 1940.
I. M. Peckham, Sol A. Abrams, John Francis Neylan and Bartley C. Crum for Appellants.
Hanna & Morton, James M. McRoberts, Cullinan, Hickey & Cullinan, Rogers & Clark, Webster V. Clark, Cullinan, Hickey & Sweigert, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison and George O. Bahrs, as Amici Curiae, on Behalf of Appellants.
Mathew O. Tobriner for Respondents.
Vallee, Beilenson & Kenny, Laurence W. Beilenson, William Berger,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- De Jonge v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.