Legal Opinion · Dissent

McKay v. Retail Automobile Salesmen's Local Union No. 1067

California Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1940No. S. F. 16016Published

1Dissent

CURTIS, J., Dissenting.

I dissent.

This is an action by certain individuals, thirty-two in number, employed as salesmen by defendant Howard Automobile Company, to enjoin defendant Retail Automobile Salesmen’s Local Union, No. 1067, its members, and those acting on its behalf from picketing the place of business of the Howard Automobile Company and advertising the business as unfair to labor. A demurrer interposed by the defendants to the joint complaint filed by the plaintiffs was sustained with leave to amend by the trial court, and the temporary restraining order theretofore issued was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API