Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Dannen
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided October 5, 1990No. 88-6145-CV-SJ-6PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SACHS, Chief Judge.
Presently before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss the contractual claims and the claims based on 12 U.S.C. § 371c of plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s First Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This action arises out of alleged misconduct of defendants while they were officers and directors of the First National Bank of St. Joseph. The FDIC maintains that this misconduct violated contractual and other duties owed to the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Miree v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Corsicana Nat. Bank of Corsicana v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Sylvester Marx v. Centran CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Jackson Sawmill Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Branch v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Gonzalez-GorrondonaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1993
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. GallagherDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- Washington Bancorporation v. SaidDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. O'Bear, Overholser, Smith & HufferDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.