Legal Opinion

Sylvester Marx v. Centran Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 8, 1984No. 83-3602PublishedCited by 145 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONTIE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Sylvester Marx appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants. Marx’s complaint alleged that the defendants violated numerous federal banking laws and breached their common law fiduciary duties to the shareholders of Centran Corporation. The district court found that some of the statutes upon which Marx relied created no cause of action which he could assert either directly or derivatively for the benefit of the corporate defendants and that the remaining statutes were not violated by the defendants. Since the federal claims…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by145 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. Crawford, III v. Jack A. RoaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  2. Amsouth Bank (03-5517) First Tennessee Bank (03-5521) v. George DaleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  3. Clay v. YatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
  4. Gooch v. Life Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. Joel R. Gaff v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API