Legal Opinion

DeCrane v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided September 3, 1982No. 483-81CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs, former servicemen, seek damages based upon the government’s alleged failure to give them the technical training they assert was promised them when they reenlisted in the Army. The government has moved for summary judgment on the alternative grounds that we have no jurisdiction over the claim and that the plaintiffs have not stated a claim upon which relief may be granted. We hold that we have jurisdiction but that the plaintiffs have not stated a valid claim for relief. We therefore grant the motion for summary judgment.

I

While serving in the Army, both plaintiffs signed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  2. Grulke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. William O. Schism and Robert Reinlie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Beauchamp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  3. The Estate of Jason Allen Smallwood v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  4. Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  5. William O. Schism and Robert Reinlie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API