Legal Opinion
Grulke v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 19, 1981No. 442-80CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff brings this suit for breach of an enlistment agreement with the United States Army (Army), seeking $1 million together with miscellaneous relief and payment of her attorney fees. Defendant has moved for summary judgment to which plaintiff has not responded. We allow the motion.
Plaintiff enlisted in the Army Reserve on August 13, 1979, for a period of 6 years under the provision of regulations whereby she could specify in advance the specialty training she would receive after completion of basic training. She opted for training as a Medical Specialist, 91B10. The agreement provided…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Capt. Milbert Mindes v. Dr. Robert C. Seaman, Secretary of the United States Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- In Re GrimleySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Daryl B. Lundgrin v. W. Graham Claytor, Secretary of the Navy of the United States, and the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Ralston Steel Corporation, Assignee of Morgan Manufacturing Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Jackson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- William O. Schism and Robert Reinlie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Brian Chu, M.D., James R. Gross, D.O., Khadijah Hamdallah, M.D., Staley Jackson, M.D., and Gregory Lower, D.O. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Canonica v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Koretsky v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- DeCrane v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.