Monsanto Co. v. C.E. Heath Compensation & Liability Insurance
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice:
This is an interlocutory appeal from a declaratory judgment action in the Superior Court. The plaintiff-appellant, Monsanto Company (“Monsanto”), seeks a declaration of judgment that it has coverage from several insurers for claims relating to pollution at various sites throughout the United States. Pursuant to a Superior Court order on October 29, 1991, the “law of the case” in this proceeding is that those coverage issues will be resolved under the law of Missouri.
In an opinion dated April 15, 1994, the Superior Court projected that the Missouri Supreme Court would allocate…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Zurich Insurance Co. v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Rodriguez v. General Accident Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Krombach v. Mayflower Ins. Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- J.H. France Refractories Co. v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Peters v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- American International Group, Inc. v. GreenbergCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2009
- American National Fire Insurance Co. v. B & L Trucking and Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- American National Fire Insurance v. B&L Trucking & Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.