Legal Opinion

Shimp v. Huff

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 11, 1989No. 71, September Term, 1988PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

In his treatise, The Law of Wills, § 34 at 69 (3rd ed. 1947), George W. Thompson warns that “[a]s a general rule, joint wills are not regarded with much favor by the courts, and are ... apt to invite litigation.” The joint will of Lester and Clara Shimp has fulfilled Thompson’s prediction by causing this Court for a second time to resolve conflicts arising from that will. In Shimp v. Shimp, 287 Md. 372, 412 A.2d 1228 (1980) (Shimp I), we addressed the issue of whether Lester and Clara’s joint will could operate as a binding contract and thereby limit the survivor’s right…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Owens v. McNallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Beeruk EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Bedal v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  4. In Re the Appraisal Under the Transfer Tax Act of the Estate of KiddNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Topham v. Knight Adjustment BureauSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gregory v. Estate of GregorySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Karsenty v. SchoukrounCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Green v. NassifCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  4. Via v. PutnamSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  5. Knell v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API