Legal Opinion
Via v. Putnam
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided June 8, 1995No. 83660PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
656 So.2d 460 (1995)
Mary Ann VIA, etc., et al., Petitioners,
v.
Mary Rachel PUTNAM, Respondent.
No. 83660.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 8, 1995.
Michael R. Riemenschneider and Maureen M. Matheson of Reinman, Harrell, Graham, Mitchell & Wattwood, P.A., Melbourne, Joseph W. Fleece, III of Holland & Knight, St. Petersburg, and James H. Richey, Melbourne, for petitioners.
Teresa Cooper Ward, St. Petersburg, for respondent.
OVERTON, Justice.
We have for review Putnam v. Via, 638 So.2d 981 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). This case involves a dispute between a decedent's surviving spouse, who claimed a share of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gates v. FoleySupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Baker v. SyfrittSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- In Re Estate of YohnSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
- Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Rubenstein v. MuellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kasischke v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Lasche v. George W. Lasche Basic Profit Sharing PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- In Re Estate of WaltersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Connor v. SOUTHWEST FLA. REGIONAL MED. CTR.Supreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Walters v. EdwardsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.