Legal Opinion

Karsenty v. Schoukroun

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 12, 2008No. 2, September Term, 2008PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrell, J.

We are asked in this case to decide whether an inter vivos transfer, in which a deceased spouse retained control over the transferred property during his lifetime, constitutes a per se violation of the surviving spouse’s statutory, elective right to a percentage of the deceased spouse’s net estate under Maryland Code (1974, 2001 Repl.Vol., 2008 Cum.Supp.), Estates and Trusts Article, § 3-203. 1 The Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County held that it does not, concluding that the decedent did not intend to defraud his surviving spouse when he transferred assets to a revocable trust that he…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Barbre v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Nesbit v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Johnson v. La Grange State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Kerwin v. DonaghyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  5. Feigley v. FeigleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bank of New York Mellon v. GeorgCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  2. Questar Builders, Inc. v. CB Flooring, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  3. In the Matter of the Estate of Karen J. Myers, Rex A. PickenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  4. Attorney Grievance v. KeatingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  5. In re Estate of ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API