Legal Opinion

Epstein v. City and County of Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 16, 1956No. 17631PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss

Defendant in error was petitioner in the trial court, and will herein be referred to as the “City,” and plaintiffs in error were Respondents in an eminent domain proceeding brought by the City. Plaintiffs in error will be referred to as Respondents. -

By its petition filed March 17, 1954, the City sought to condemn three lots located at the southwest corner of Washington Street and 46th Avenue in Denver, “for rights of way and access rights required for the Valley Highway as planned, described and set forth in the Agreement dated July 1, 1947, entered into between the City and County of Denver…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Reeves v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  2. Thornton v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  3. Wassenich v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  4. City of St. Louis v. Paramount Shoe Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. State Highway Commission v. Superbilt Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Department of Highways v. SchulhoffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  2. Minto v. LambertColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. State v. MelroseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. Vail Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  5. Atlantic Refining Co. v. Director of Public WorksSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API