Maddox v. Denka Chemical Corp.
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COHEN, Justice.
Maddox appeals from a take-nothing judgment rendered against him in accordance with a jury verdict. We reverse and remand.
Facts
Maddox sued Denka for personal injuries he sustained at Denka’s chemical plant while employed by H-R International (H-R), an independent contractor hired to work construction at Denka’s plant. On March 28, 1987, Maddox’s foreman told him to climb to the second level and place a 20-inch piece of pipe through a hole. Maddox was told that the floor plates on the decking were not “tacked down.” During the job, the pipe hit the decking and then hit…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Texas Department of Human Services v. E.B.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Redinger v. Living, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Mobil Chemical Company v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- Acord v. General Motors Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Varela v. American Petrofina Co. of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- C.M. Asfahl Agency v. Tensor Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
- GTE Mobilnet of South Texas Ltd. Partnership v. Telecell Cellular, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
- Dallas Market Center Development Co. v. LiedekerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Insurance Network of Texas v. Kloesel, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
- Centurion Planning Corp. v. Seabrook Venture II, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.