Legal Opinion

Maddox v. Denka Chemical Corp.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided July 11, 1996No. 01-93-00020-CVPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHEN, Justice.

Maddox appeals from a take-nothing judgment rendered against him in accordance with a jury verdict. We reverse and remand.

Facts

Maddox sued Denka for personal injuries he sustained at Denka’s chemical plant while employed by H-R International (H-R), an independent contractor hired to work construction at Denka’s plant. On March 28, 1987, Maddox’s foreman told him to climb to the second level and place a 20-inch piece of pipe through a hole. Maddox was told that the floor plates on the decking were not “tacked down.” During the job, the pipe hit the decking and then hit…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Human Services v. E.B.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Redinger v. Living, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Mobil Chemical Company v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Acord v. General Motors Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Varela v. American Petrofina Co. of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. C.M. Asfahl Agency v. Tensor Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
  2. GTE Mobilnet of South Texas Ltd. Partnership v. Telecell Cellular, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
  3. Dallas Market Center Development Co. v. LiedekerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Insurance Network of Texas v. Kloesel, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
  5. Centurion Planning Corp. v. Seabrook Venture II, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API