Legal Opinion

Dallas Market Center Development Co. v. Liedeker

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1997No. 96-1240PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Per curiam

The dispositive question in this case is whether the trial court erred in charging the jury that an elevator owner owes a passenger a high duty of care rather than an ordinary duty of care. We answer yes. Because the case must be remanded for retrial, we also consider whether the district court erred in refusing to charge the jury on premises liability.

A timing device on a freight elevator in Dallas Market Center Development Company’s Loew’s Anatole Hotel automatically lowered the entry gate twenty-one seconds after it opened. A bell warning that the gate was lowering had been muffled because…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. PayneTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Gussie Fox v. Dallas Hotel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Spencer v. Eagle Star Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Clayton W. Williams, Jr., Inc. v. OlivoTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Haddock v. ArnspigerTexas Supreme Court · 1990

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Torrington Co. v. StutzmanTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Rosell v. Central West Motor Stages, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
  3. Cruz v. Andrews Restoration, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
  4. DaimlerChrysler Motors Co., LLC v. Manuel, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
  5. Duncan Land & Exploration, Inc. v. LittlepageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API