City of Birmingham v. Corr
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
The action is in trespass.
The theory of the suit is that in widening and deepening a drainage canal carrying the waters of Tillage creek in the East Lake area of the city of Birmingham, appellee’s city lot was encroached upon, and subjected in part to public use without just compensation ; damages being sought for the decreased value of the lot by reason of such excavation.
The city of Birmingham and Donahoo Contracting Company, the contractor doing the work for the city, were joined as parties, defendant. The trial court gave the affirmative charge in behalf of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Birmingham v. CarleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- City of Montgomery v. FergusonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- City of Birmingham v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- City of Anniston v. HillmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- City of Decatur v. GilliamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brown v. City of FairhopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- City of Fairhope v. RaddcliffeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
- City of Prattville v. CorleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Brooks v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Isbell v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.