Legal Opinion

City of Decatur v. Gilliam

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 5, 1931No. 8 Div. 282PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

There is no apt ground of demurrer to the complaint whereby its sufficiency is tested for the failure to allege that the defect referred to in it constituted a dangerous or unsafe condition. If we assume that the complaint should either allege or show by the facts alleged that the defect was dangerous or unsafe (43 Corpus Juris, 1226), a ground of the demurrer should be directed to that contention. The court instructed the jury that the defect must be such a condition as that it was not reasonably safe for travel; so that defendant did not sustain injury in this respect had the demurrer been…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Southern Ry. Co. v. DicksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Best Park & Amusement Co. v. RollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. City of Birmingham v. CarleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Walker County v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. City of Mobile v. McClureSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Tuscaloosa v. FairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Jacks v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Breed Ex Rel. Breed v. ShanerHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Brown v. City of FairhopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  5. City of Birmingham v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API