Legal Opinion

City of Prattville v. Corley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 10, 2003No. 1020075, 1020076 and 1020077PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The City of Prattville ("the City") appeals from the trial court's order declaring that § 11-93-2, Ala. Code 1975, controls the damages awards for tort claims brought by residents and business owners (collectively "residents") against the City arising from flooding that occurred on September 1, 2000.1 We affirm the order of the trial court.

The facts are not disputed. On September 1, 2000, eight inches or more of rain fell in the City within a few hours. The City's storm drains and sanitary sewers overflowed, severely damaging a number of residences and businesses. At the urging of the City's…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. NielsenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. DeKalb County LP Gas Co., Inc. v. Suburban Gas, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  4. Ex Parte GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  5. Rogers Foundation Repair, Inc. v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Suttles v. RoySupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  2. Morrow v. Caldwell ex rel. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  3. City of Birmingham v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. Lee v. HouserSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  5. Cockrell v. PruittSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API